Lordtobi ( ✉) 14:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Reply I merged the information into development section myself before I saw this conversation. LichWizard talk 13:15, 1 June 2018 (UTC) Reply Honestly, I'm not if this short of content warrants a whole section, consider merging it into Development. I think it could use a bit more work and expanding, but I thought it was good enough to put in the article at this point. Thanks for the links ) - LichWizard talk 19:30, (UTC) Reply Alright, I've added a section for Team Fortress 1.5. Pizzahut2 ( talk) 19:18, (UTC) Reply Oh okay, that makes sense. It's still included in every current TFC install, even in the HLDS.
Play tfc team fortress classic manual#
You guys can take a look and make suggestions/make changes/discuss it here if you would like ) - LichWizard talk 13:11, (UTC) Reply Couple more links:ītw the "TF 1.5 players guide" above is the manual which I was talking about. I've begun working on a section for TF1.5 over in my sandbox using the sources we've gathered. Well it seems we have a decent amount of sources here :P - LichWizard talk 15:52, (UTC) Reply
Play tfc team fortress classic Patch#
ferret ( talk) 12:49, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Reply As Ferret says, Giant Bomb is a user-generated site and as such falls under WP:USERG, meaning that, unfortunately, we cannot use it because the info given might not be accurate or presented properly to be considered reliable. Would you be able to link it here on the talk page? Lordtobi ( ✉) 12:22, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Reply Here you go: - LichWizard ( talk) 12:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Reply Giantbomb allows user editing, like a Wiki/wikia. I think this illustrates a range of 47-48 is fair and takes into account current market trends.I have found a website that could be added as citation for the heavy stats, the only thing is the site lists all the class' stats on one page, is it still acceptable to cite it? - LichWizard ( talk) 12:14, 5 April 2018 (UTC) Reply That depends on which page you are talking about.
On the date and time of suggestion, STN.Trading were:Ĭurrently lowest sellers are sitting at 47.44-48 (first three listing pages) and highest buyers are sitting at around 47-48.33 (first two listing pages). On the date and time of suggestion, Scrap.tf were: On 8 September 2022 at 12:13, keys were : It seems like the price is already dropping further below 50 indeed. I put this data in a spreadsheet and calculated the average. Data included for convenience.ĭata from Gladiator.tf from original suggestion. Said commentary pointed out that more weight should be put on what current sellers and buyers are asking. Resuggesting considering commentary on my previous suggestion.
0 kommentar(er)
